2018-05-12                     House Journal                      Page 3752
HB 233                                                                                                                        
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                                  
House consider the Senate message (page 3738) on the following:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN) am                                                                                          
     "An Act relating to the insurance tax education credit, the income                                                         
     tax education credit, the oil or gas producer education credit, the                                                        
     property tax education credit, the mining business education                                                               
     credit, the fisheries business education credit, and the fisheries                                                         
     resource landing tax education credit; providing for an effective                                                          
     date by repealing the effective dates of secs. 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 16, 18,                                                    
     21, 23, 25, 28, 30, 32, 35, 37, 39, 42, 44, 46, 49, 51, 53, and 55,                                                        
     ch. 92, SLA 2010, sec. 14, ch. 7, FSSLA 2011, secs. 15, 17, 19,                                                            
     21, 23, and 25, ch. 74, SLA 2012, sec. 49, ch. 14, SLA 2014, secs.                                                         
     37, 40, 43, and 46, ch. 15, SLA 2014, and secs. 26 and 31, ch. 61,                                                         

2018-05-12                     House Journal                      Page 3753
     SLA 2014; providing for an effective date by amending the                                                                  
     effective date of secs. 1, 2, and 21, ch. 61, SLA 2014; and                                                                
     providing for an effective date."                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
and                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 233(FIN)                                                                               
     (same title)                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kreiss-Tomkins moved and asked unanimous consent                                                                 
to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest.  Objection was                                                        
heard, and he was required to vote.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate                                                                   
amendment and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 233(FIN)                                                                                                               
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  39   NAYS:  1   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara,                                                                 
Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito,                                                                
Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman,                                                                  
Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz,                                                          
Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck,                                                               
Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
SCS CSHB 233(FIN).                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                

2018-05-12                     House Journal                      Page 3754
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.